Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Wire Bonders' Speak

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Wire Bonder: On the floor at Productronica 2009

Posted by Rich Hueners on Thu, Dec 10, 2009 @ 10:49 AM

From the floor of Productronica in Munich, Germany. Traffic was much the same as it was at IMAPS 2009 in San Jose. From Tuesday thru Thursday, we saw medium traffic in the morning to afternoon. On Friday, the volume was noticeably lower. Nonetheless, it was a a successful show. 

Palomar's highly versatile 8000 Wire Bonder/Ball Bumper was center stage at the booth, wire bonding on a 10"x8" stage! Palomar's 6500 Ultra High Accuracy Die Bonder got considerable interest from many visitors, especially from those in the LED manufacturing business.Palomar Technologies Productronica 2009

One can always get a good feel for the pulse of the business by looking at the number of exhibitors. In the case of Productronica, there were certainly fewer exhibitors. But I must say that the show's management did a great job in laying out the booths in proportion to the number of booth attendees: case it point, 50% of the trade show area was full AND yet it did not feel empty. The standard of booths felt higher than Semicon West. It was plain to see that exhibitors/companies were focused more on quality than quantity. 

The most significant thing we saw at this show was an influx of business from Eastern Europe, specifically Russia, Romania and the Czech Republic. Countries who once weren't considered real business opportunities in the advanced high tech market are suddenly viable. LED manufacturers represented the bulk of Eastern European companies. 

Palomar Technologies Productronica Munich LED

 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Jim Goodall on Palomar’s Supply Chain

Posted by Rich Hueners on Fri, Oct 16, 2009 @ 06:04 PM

 

I was asked to contribute to the Palomar Technologies’ blog after a recent visit to their factory. This came about by way of meeting an employee of Palomar who was part of an executive education program that I am participating in at USD.  He shared with me a little about Palomar: their advanced microelectronic packaging systems manufacturing business, their contract assembly division (Palomar Microelectronics), the growth that they were seeing across all lines of the business and their goals for the future. Being a supply chain professional I was very interested in learning more about the supply chain behind Palomar, hence I graciously accepted the invitation to visit.

 

Upon entering the facility, I was received with a warm reception.  Here are some brief thoughts from what proved to be a fascinating and insightful visit:

 

Supply Chain Defined: 

In short, a company’s supply chain represents the flow of value from raw materials to the end customer.  Or, “a supply chain is the system of organizations, people, technology, activities, information and resources involved in moving a product or service”.

The term “supply chain” is admittedly a loose metaphor.  I prefer the term “Value Network” (see depiction below) as a network is more indicative of how most companies interact with competitors, customers, suppliers, regulators, etc.  Advanced value networks have a lot of characteristics, some of which include: systems of trust, collaborative innovation, lean processes, and advanced relationship management techniques. 

supply chain cask technologies

It was exciting to see elements of Value Network Management in practice at Palomar.  For example...

 

Innovation: 

My new friend shared with me how Palomar works with its customers to solve their large, unmet needs (needless to say, I was thrilled to hear this). It was evident that the company has carved out a nice niche in that it has (and is) consciously chosen not to be in the market of mass production;rather its focus is on high mix/low volume, high quality production – this enables them to be very attentive to solving unique customer problems.  An example given was the work they did with a military and defense contractor based in Europe. This customer had been turned away by other suppliers because their packaging challenge necessitated a customized solution and required only a few systems – these other suppliers could not meet the customer’s need even if they wanted to – they were entirely in the mass production mindset (these suppliers were in the business of selling 50-100 systems at a time, Palomar is in the business of customizing and selling1, 2, or 10 systems).  Palomar was able to win the customer’s order having proved able to meet their challenge and provide a custom solution (this included service and support, something the other suppliers were incapable of providing).  Result:  a satisfied customer who invariably will be a net promoter vs. detractor.

 

“Lean”: 

Supply chain professionals like me have been indoctrinated over the years on TPS (Toyota Production System)thinking.  Many companies havetried to replicate TPS with mixed results.  Toyota even invites potential competitors into its factoriesto see TPS at work.  Why would they do this?  Because they know a lot of what’s behind TPS “is in the walls” meaning you can sense it and feel it but it’s very hard for an outsider to replicate. 

 

The Intangibles

While walking the “supply chain” at Palomar, I got the sense that something special was “in the walls”.  You know it when you see it: professionalism, cleanliness, pride of work, order…it’s all there.  Having worked for a Fortune 50 company and gained a sense for world-class operations, I must say what I witnessed at Palomar appeared to be as good or better than what we had going at a multi-billion dollar company. 

cask technologies pyramid

 

I’ll pose a few questions to close on:

1.  Is your Supply Chain and Procurement organization looked to as source of competitive advantage for your company?  What characteristics have you seen with these organizations?

2.  In a fast moving, rapidly changing world the most sustainable source of competitive advantage is….? 

 

Visit Cask Technologies to see how CEO’s answered the last question in a recent survey.

-Jim Goodall

 

Jim Goodall is a Supply Chain/Value Network expert with Cask Technologies and can be reached at jim.goodall@casktechnologies.com.For more information, you can visit www.casktechnologies.com

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Die Bonding for Start-Ups

Posted by Rich Hueners on Fri, Sep 11, 2009 @ 05:48 PM

Contract assembly services are invauable for start-ups and cash strapped companies who need packaging and assembly production but don't have (or want) the resources needed for out-right capital equipment purchases.

It is rare for die bonding and wire bonding equipment manufacturers to offer contract assembly services. Microelectronic packaging equipment manufacturers are often in the best position to understand and perform assembly and packaging services. This is because of the following:

1) they have intimate knowledge and understanding of their packaging and assembly systems and how to use them

2) they know how to reconfigure the packaging and assembly systems for many unique applications

3) they have experienced engineers dedicated to fine-tuning customers' processes and products on the packaging and assembly systems

4) the packaging and assembly systems are already is in place at their showrooms, testing facilities and laboratories 

microelectronics assemblyFor a designer and manufacturer of automated high-precision wire bonders, die bonders and component placement systems,  providing scalable production of complex microelectronic devices at its own facilities, is a natural progression.

Because the hybrid microelectronics packaging is a niche business, and volume of system sales are low in comparision to its semiconductor sibling, the machines are built on order (usually). A glaring benefit to using contract assembly with a packaging and assembly system manufacturer is the ability to set up a (customer's) process and move into production, while that customer's systems are being built. One the system is built, then shipped, the process and production are seamlessly integrated at customer's facilities. 

If you have a contract assembly need, contact us with your challenge and we will present a solution for free

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Wire Bonding and Ball Bumping Improvements

Posted by Rich Hueners on Sun, Aug 30, 2009 @ 12:09 AM

Shrinking electronic package geometries are driving continuous improvements in interconnect technologies. Wire Bonding is a mature technology that continues to meet challenges of finer geometric capability: loop shape, bond pitch, ball size, and stitch size control.  

*The below rendering is a simplified representation of a wire interconnection showing the loop and change in ball and stitch geometries which occur during the ultrasonic bonding process.  

wire interconnection drawing

 

Palomar engineers developed a method called "Adaptive Bond Deformationtrademark" (ABD) method to enable the user to better improve cost-effectiveness of their wire bonding and ball bumping system (side note: unique ball bump applications where material, process and tool variations adversely affected yields due to occasional shorting of adjacent bumps were part of the motivation in developing ABDtrademark). 

The essence of ABDtrademark is to improve bond geometry; to control the geometry of both ball and stitch according to process parameter inputs supplied by the user; the technique adapts to normal variations in bond surface, bond tool coupling, part fixture, and other difficult to measure influences. Using Adaptive Bond Deformationtrademark the user is able to produce bonded ball bumps, and stitches with significant improvement in geometry consistency with similar or better results for ball shear and pul strength when compared to non-adaptive bonding. 

Adaptive Bond Deformationtrademark was developed to meet the challenges of the packaging industry. These challenges require a common set of improvements as geometries continue to shrink:

1) Uniformity of ball bump heigh and/or bump diameter to allow...

a. Reduced bond pitch for wires

b. Reduced bond pitch for bumps

c. Better bump co-planarity 

 2) Uniformity of stitch impressions to...

a. Minimize adverse impacts to sensitive materials for stitch

3) Process...

a. Reduced process develop time

b. Reduce sensitivity to material, environment, and setup variation 

c. Real-time capture/qualification of production data

d. Data trending analysis of production data 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Semiconductor vs. Hybrid Wire Bonders

Posted by Rich Hueners on Wed, Aug 19, 2009 @ 05:14 PM

The words "jellybean" and "odd form factor" are often used to describe the differences between the widely used semiconductor wire bonder and the more customized, less common-place hybrid wire bonder. At the end of the day, the choice of bonder will be determined by your application.  laser diode package

The two bonders cater to different markets  and is arguably not considered a competitive product (semiconductor wire bonder manufactures is 90% of the wire bonder market, selling hundreds of bonders a year; the hybrid wire bonder manufacturers falls in later 10% of all bonders, with firms often selling fewer than 100 bonders a year). The heart of the difference lies in the bonder's speed, flexibility and bonding envelope. 

Semiconductor Bonder (Wire or Die)

  1. Designed to build 10's of millions of a specific product, many times lead frame oriented (cell phones, PC components, etc) - user inconvenice is result of a bad wire
  2. Very small bonding envelopes (typically 2x2 inch area)
  3. Very fast, in part due to cantilevering the transducer; but this reduces overall interconnect reliability and it is measureable
  4. Inexpensive (as compared to hybrid wire bonder)
  5. Not very flexible 
  6. Manufacturer unlikely to provide customization in tooling, stages, training, and on-site support
  7. Little or no after sales support if buyer purchases <~5 bonders at a time (margins are volume driven)

Hybrid Bonder (Wire or Die)

  1. Designed for high reliability interconnect requirements; the bonds MUST generate high reliability interconnects (radar systems, pace makers, LED arrays) - the lose of human life could be caused by a bad wire
  2. Large bonding envelope in all three axis' X/Y, Z
  3. Slower, in large part due to a perpendicular transducer/bonding tool at the time of ultrasonic activity, building a measurably better bond
  4. Great flexiblity
  5. Expensive (as compared to semiconductor wire bonder)
  6. Manufacturer will customize tooling, stages, software, provide extensive options, create customized training, deliver excellent on-site support throughout the life of the product
  7. After sales support is greater: more training, process assistance, etc. You are buying a "complete solution"

Aerospace and defense, medical device manufacturers, telecom and datacom (including photonics and broadband), and consumer high technology industries are exclusively served by the hybrid bonder, both in wire bonding and die attach. The semiconductor bonder simply is not designed to package things such as anti-lock brake systems, adaptive cruise control systems, flight hardware, missiles and spacecraft.

This brings us back to jellybean vs. odd form factor - both semi and hybrid have excellent manufacturers providing capital equipment. Each bonder type has its neccesary place in the market provided the interconnect basis of all technology today. 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Ball Bonder and Fine-Pitch Interconnects

Posted by Rich Hueners on Fri, Jul 31, 2009 @ 09:40 PM

The need to package more in less space has caused ASIC (application specific integrated circuit) designs to become denser, thus keeping in line with "Moore's Law" if only through support of the theory itself.  

It was once thought that the best method for interconnect fine-pitch (close together) packaging was through wedge bonds - this is not the case necessarily any longer. In the late 1990's, in the midst of the optoelectronic boom, the typical bond pitch decreased from approximately 110 microns to approximately 90 microns. During that period, the average wedge tool tip was roughly one-third the width of a ball bond capillary tip. Simply put the ball bondercapillary materials lacked robustness to support fine-pitch processes. Since then, greatly improved materials have enabled fine-pitch designs where tip dimensions of less than 70 microns are more and more common.  Smaller features, higher density, and increased I/O (input/output; for example, the communication interface between a computer and a user or another system) demand finer pitch.

ball bonder tool

Palomar Microelectronics' engineers, on the front lines of the newest trends in the packaging industry, vouch for the increased customer need for smaller package size in combination with increased performance. In today's fine-pitch environment, Microelectronics performs contract assembly services to overcome fine-pitch challenges. Palomar Microelectronics General Manager Don Beck says "any device that would previously have been bonded using a wedge bonder is bonded faster using a ball bonder." 

With faster bonding, yield increases and with that cost-effectiveness goes up. In the end, it is a ROI improving proposition.  

 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

RF Package Design: SoC vs. SiP

Posted by Kathryn Vargas on Tue, Jul 07, 2009 @ 06:47 PM

Given the consumer electronic product industry's trend toward decreased size, increased portability and convergence of function, electronics manufacturers are confronted with a device integration challenge. Two solutions that have emerged from this issue are system-on-a-chip (SoC) and system-in-a-package (SiP) technologies. The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) has identified these approaches as two of the most attractive approaches for 3D packaging. These solutions are being used in a variety of industries, including the computer, consumer, aerospace, military, and medical electronic industries. SoC's and SiP's can be accomplished with a wire bonder or ball bonder.

The first solution, system-on-a-chip (SoC) technology, was designed for applications that require components implemented into a single integrated circuit, such as those applications requiring the lowest power, highest clock rates and lowest unit costs. This single chip can contain a variety of functions including digital, analog, mixed-signal, and RF. The benefits of this technology include a smaller footprint and space requirements, higher performance due to the increased number of circuits on the chip, greater system reliability, lower power requirements, and a potentially lower cost for the end user.

The second solution, system-in-a-package (SiP) technology, was designed for multiple advanced packaging applications that require a fully functional, highly specialized module that can be easily integrated into a system. A SiP includes multiple integrated circuits enclosed in a single package or module. The dies containing the integrated circuits may be stacked vertically on a substrate and connected by wires bonded to the package. Alternative, the dies can be connected through flip chip technology, in which solder or gold ball bumps are used to join stacked chips together. Localizing functionality to a SiP module reduces the complexity and cost of the system board, and removes this design burden from the system designer.

So which technology is better?

The choice between SiP and SoC often creates a debate among RF designers because both approaches provide different advantages for different end-market applications. SiPs allow for relatively easy hetero-integration of analog and RF functionalities with digital CMOS, with possible cost and performance benefits. However, proper system partitioning at the design stage is key to obtaining the maximum value from a SiP. SoCs provide the lowest manufacturing cost, but design costs are often higher and time-to-market is generally slower. Depending on the anticipated unit volumes and target ASPs for the required system, either approach may be desirable.

System in a package

1 Comments Click here to read/write comments

RF Packaging - Driving Forces, Trends...and Automation

Posted by Kathryn Vargas on Fri, Jun 26, 2009 @ 12:58 PM
The objective of RF packaging, where RF (Radio frequency) is the range of electromagnetic frequencies above the audio range and below infrared light (from 10kHz to 300GHz), is to transfer signals while preserving bandwidth (Tummala). This becomes more challenging at higher frequencies because of the wave nature of RF signals. The applications of personal communication, wireless local area networks, satellite communications, and automotive electronics, are providing the driving force for packaging needs at higher frequencies, motivating manufacturers to provide lower cost technology solutions with increasingly higher performance and functionality. In addition, there is a driving force for new products to provide the same functionality at a smaller overall size, lower power and better design, product attributes which are determined through design and manufacture (Zhang, Lec 1).

Why are these attributes important? Take RF power for example, which is the primary measure of a wireless signal. In a receiver, signal strength is a key factor in maintaining reliable communications. In the transmitter, the amount of power transmitted is important for maintaining the range and reliability of the radio link.

Automation

It has been our experience, in the Palomar Mircoelectronics lab, that automating the RF Packaging process, even at the ever increasing levels of complexity and minaturization, is possible. Once the process is set up, a single operator can build the needed packages in a cost-effective manner. The operator works with 3 or 4 systems at time: high accuracy wire bonder, a flexible a
wire bonding - complex low loopsnd accurate die bonder and an additional high accuracy die bonder (with an optional configuration for wafer scale packaging). If there is a need for an automated precision dispenser, that too can be added to the mix. (right: wire bonder performing complex low loops that are often used in RF packaging)                                               

Evolution
Wireless technologies have evolved rapidly over the past two decades. Previously large RF/microwave modules have begun to evolve into multi-function systems such as system-on-a-chip (SoC) and sytstem-in-a-package (SiP) methodologies. Many industries are utilizing these technologies. For example, the medical industry is using RF functionalities for pacemakers and other implantable devices. The aerospace and defense industries are creating new communication, surveillance and anti-jamming technologies for the modern battlefield. And industrial RF application developers are improving the real-time monitoring of field and factory operations. (Ebbutt)

Trends
There are several trends occurring in RF packaging. The first is variation in levels of integration: an integrated package solution provides a reasonable time to market with good yield, while a fully integrated solution takes a longer time to go to market. Second is to integrate passive components: there has been a decrease in passive components and a move to multilayer devices. Third is to integrate the RF substrate: the RF substrate is moving towards a modular design with integrated components. Finally, there is an increasing trend for RF MEMS as the demand exists for smaller and smaller devices.
 
_______________________________________________________________
References

Allen, Roger. Shrinking ICs Need High Density In A Package Deal. July 24, 2008. http://electronicdesign.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=19340

Ebbutt, Ralph. Electronic Packaging RF SiPs Demand Early Packaging Focus. 2009. http://www.wirelessdesignmag.com/ShowPR.aspx?PUBCODE=055&ACCT=0032119&ISSUE=0904&RELTYPE=ic&PRODCODE=O0160&PRODLETT=A&CommonCount=0

Eummala, Rao R., Chapman, Steve. Fundamentals of Microsystems Packaging. 2001. http://books.google.com/books?id=P93ZrOWHlO0C&pg=PA534&lpg=PA534&dq=history+rf+packaging&source=bl&ots=rjmKkSb5zT&sig=BxEbGFb8N7aH0Ije5eYJ2OWiiiE&hl=en&ei=ArZCSr_bOoXYtgPxi43MDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3.

Zheng, Li-Rong. Lecture 1: Evolution of Electronic Systems from Chips to Cabinets. http://www.ict.kth.se/courses/IL2208/Lectures/ESP_Lect1.pdf

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

EMPC 2009 Italy - Chain Wire Bonding

Posted by Rich Hueners on Tue, May 26, 2009 @ 01:12 PM

Who doesn't like to go to Italy on a business trip? It was never surprising to see my Mom suddenly become interested in my Dad's business when his business required him to travel to Europe, specifically to Italy.

Well, this is that time of year again and Europe is hot with innovations in the Microelectronic and Optoelectronic Packaging Industry. Palomar's Sr. Scentist, Daniel D. Evans Jr., is gearing up to travel to Italy (with his wife of course!) to present a paper on "Chain Wire Bonding of a RF-SOE Package using a Gold Ball Bonder". 

Mr. Evans will be presenting at EMPC at the Wirebonding Seminar on Monday, June 15th. He will be discussing new Ball Bonding technology as an excellent alternative to traditonal Wedge Bonding. It will introduce the RF-SOE Package Wire Bonding requirements then actual results achieved using chain bonding technology. The abstract of the paper is as follows:

"RF-SOE power transistors are traditionally wire bonded using gold wedge bonders to create strings of loop profiles with short and long wires. A Ball Bond technology, referred to as Chain Bonding, creates a ball-loop-stitch-loop-stitch-loop-stitch - this is demonstrated as an alternative to these traditional wedge bond solutions. Initial Chain Bonding results using a Ball Bonder produced comparable performance as a wedge bonded product, but using more prevelant ball bonding technology." This process is can only be accomplished by using a highly versatile, accurate and precise wire bonder

 RF-SOE packageRF-SOE package

Chain Bonding technology is applied to matrix LED packages, RF-SOE packages and other packages that require a string of interconnections.

Other companies presenting on Monday at the Wirebonding seminar include ESEC, Heese & Knipps, K & S, ASM, F K Delvotec and Hereaus.

If you'd like more information on attended the Wirebonding Seminar at EMPC, please email Mark Shaw: segreteria@empc2009.org

For our readers convenience, I have attached directions to EMPC 2009. 

 

Technorati Profile

2 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Die Bonding for High Powered Devices

Posted by Kathryn Vargas on Wed, May 20, 2009 @ 01:16 PM

Die bonding with eutectic solder processing is becoming more important as thermal challenges increase with the proliferation of laser diode assemblies. A solder joint functions as both the electrical contact and the primary heat transfer interface between the die and its substrate. Lasers also require precise temperature control during operation, and the required drive current rises rapidly with increased operating temperatures. Without a robust thermal interface, increased device temperatures severely degrade light output performance and device longevity.

In a eutectic solder bond, where eutectic means "easily melted", solder reacts with a small amount of the base metal to form an intermetallic, covalent bond. The intermetallic compound is typically hard and brittle, and it is the source of strength of the solder joint.

For eutectic soldering to occur, the metal must be at the eutectic temperature, the thermal conductivity of the metal must be in the correct range, and the contact angle on the metal's surface must be minimized.

The eutectic temperature for a metal is the temperature and percent mixture where a substance will go directly from pure solid to pure liquid. At any point on the phase diagram above the eutectic line, the mixture is 100 percent liquid, and any point below, it is a solid. The thermal conductivity of the substrate requires that there is some means of heating the joint area where the solder is placed. However, the applied heat cannot be so excessive that it damages surrounding components. In terms of wetting, the joining surfaces must permit molten solder to wet and spread during the available time window without significant de-wetting. For the best wetting, the contact angle q must be minimized. The dividing line between "good" and "bad" wetting is usually considered to be a contact angle of 90°. Issues arise when contaminants are introduced to the surface, referred to as passivation. Passivation layers affect wetting by forming a barrier between the solder and base metal, and these layers are typically oxide films that may be only a few angstroms thick. Other elements, such as nickel, can form passivation films that require fluxes (solvents) or plasma cleaning to remove. Oils, silicones and organics are frequent contaminants that can also form barriers to wetting and act as a passivation layer.

Wetting vs. Non-Wetting Conditions

Figure: Wetting vs. non-wetting conditions

Beyond the basic requirements for eutectic soldering, many additional factors contribute to conditions required for a robust solder joint, including die metallization, temperature and the substrate material itself.

In gold metallization, the metallization thickness, composition, contaminants and coverage applied during this process are all key factors to solder the die. Usually the equipment used to solder the die must adapt all process variables to accommodate the existing die fabrication and metallization properties. Temperature control is important to solder joint formation because excessive temperature can blister the thin coating, rendering the module useless. Also, higher temperatures promote the formation of oxides that are barriers to wetting.

To apply heat to a sub-assembly, there are two primary methods pulse heat profiling and steady-state heating with a scrubbing action. Scrub attachment is a quick, straightforward, and reliable process, but a downside of the process is mechanical agitation of the die. Pulse heat profiling is mechanically less stressful to but often involves additional process planning. Understanding which bonding process matches a particular package design leads to smart thermal management decisions which result in maximum yielded throughput and profit.

In terms of choosing the right substrate material, ceramic carriers are popular as substrates because of their availability, cost and heat transfer characteristics. They are mostly alumina-based compounds. In attempts to drive broadband packaging costs lower, some customers are migrating to copper-plated substrates. Unfortunately, copper materials at high temperatures rapidly form a thick copper oxide layer if exposed to the atmosphere. To solder to a copper base, aggressive cleaning processes before bonding and an inert forming gas environment during bonding are required.

When contemplating design decisions for packaging components, process and design engineers should carefully consider the implications of the various eutectic assembly inputs and processes required for successful die bonding, especially when looking for ways to reduce costs.

Side note: check out the best periodic table yet to be found online www.ptable.com

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

All Posts | Next Page